two simple images randomly posted together @ moblog and *slam bam* we have a mathematical definition of why sheep are evil:
“Evil = not Good. And furthermore, I can prove that sheep in the picture above is evil.
sheep in picture above
= sheep + pointy teeth
= (wool + mutton) + pointy teeth
since good + evil = neutral = 0, it can be added to one side of the equation.
(wool + mutton) + pointy teeth + neutral + neutral
= wool + mutton + pointy teeth + good + evil + good + evil
rearrange:
= wool + evil + mutton + good + pointy teeth + good + evil
as wool is a inherently good concept, wool + evil =0.
similarly, as mutton is evil, mutton + good = 0. As it can be seen from this example sheep are generally of a neutral persuasion.
This leaves us with:
sheep in picture above
= neutral + neutral + pointy teeth + good + evil
= pointy teeth + good + evil
The pointy teeth above are obviously not designed to be for the forces of good, hence they must be evil.
Thus pointy teeth + good = 0
leaving us with:
sheep in picture above
= evil.
Q.E.D.”
cant say i got that but it does sound very true!
.. and i can’t spell EQUATIONS!
.. and my SHEEPS picture disappeared!
http://images4.fotki.com/v38/photos/4/43852/174528/
ChickenBurgersForSale-vi.jpg